Wednesday 4 June:Nowadays I'm playing online poker at Pokerstars.com. My favorite levels range from 200NL to 600NL. I usually play the big tournaments each Sunday and the freerolls available for Supernova players but I haven't scored big lately. You can check my Tournament Performance Gallery.
You can find me playing in the Poker Rooms using the following aliases:
Let's
assume there is a professional gambler named "Bob". He has designed his own
betting strategy by improving a strategy he purchased online, he has also
looked into trading where he is more than successful and at the same time he
has studied Texas Hold'em Poker so well that he manages to show significant
profits over the past months. The problem is Bob has only one life, how can he
make most of it?
So your betting system performs pretty well, you are completely satisfied by your winnings but you are worried about the common losing runs you experience from time to time. Should you worry? What is the maximum expected losing run you would encounter in the future? How many bets should you be happy to lose in a row? It is always better to be prepared for the expected events, since the unexpected ones are rare after all.
Lots of people keep asking about the betting system they should follow and how much risk they should put their bankroll in. If you do just a little research, you'll keep bumping into the same percentage over and over again. It seems that 2% is a magical number. Or maybe not? What is a simple explanation of that percentage? And say I'm convinced of not risking more than 2% of my bankroll, what about my staking plan? Should my betting be influenced by the odds or not?
Today we'll talk about the capital someone needs in gambling and how much money should risk in a single bet. The following questions are 3 of the most common ones, although it is relatively easy to be answered.
hi jim mporis na kanis ena tutorial gia ...
Thanks very much for the information. It...
Hi great site, interesting stuff, i have...
this is good site for gambling
Hi Buzz, no, that equity curve is not mi...